How a UX Design Audit Reveals What’s Really Slowing Down Your SaaS Products

At a glance

At some point, most SaaS teams reach the same conclusion. “The product feels outdated.” “We probably need a redesign.”The instinct is understandable. When adoption slows or users start pushing back, the interface becomes an easy suspect. But more often than not, redesigning without understanding the real problem only creates a better-looking version of the same friction. This is where a UX design audit becomes far more valuable than jumping straight into visual changes.

‍

‍

The Redesign Reflex

As products grow, friction shows up quietly. Support tickets increase. Onboarding feels longer. Users hesitate in places that used to feel obvious. Internally, these signals often translate into a simple narrative: the UI needs improvement. What’s usually missed is that most UX issues are not visual. They are structural. Redesigns that focus only on aesthetics tend to move buttons, change colours, and adjust layouts. Sometimes they feel fresher. Rarely do they solve the underlying issues that slow users down.

‍

[What Is a UX Audit]What a UX Design Audit Actually Is

A UX design audit is not a critique of how your product looks. It is a structured way to understand how your product behaves from a user’s point of view.


At its core, an audit examines:

• How users move through key workflows
• Where clarity drops and hesitation increases
• How consistent interactions are across the product
• Whether the interface supports decisions or complicates them


The goal is not to point out flaws, but to surface patterns. Patterns are what tell you where effort should be focused and where it should not.

‍

‍

[What UX Audits Reveal]What UX Audits Reveal That Teams Often Miss

One of the most valuable outcomes of a UX audit is perspective. Internal teams are deeply familiar with the product. That familiarity makes blind spots almost inevitable.
Audits often reveal that:

• Users understand features, but not priorities
• Dashboards show data, but don’t support decisions
• Onboarding explains the product, but not the value
• Similar actions behave differently across screens


None of these issues feel dramatic on their own. Together, they create friction that compounds as the product scales.

We saw this during our work on the SaaS experience for Cimmra, a supply chain and procurement platform used by operational teams. The product was functionally strong, but users often hesitated on key screens not because they didn’t understand the feature, but because the interface didn’t clearly signal priority. A UX audit helped surface these patterns early, making it clear where clarity was missing and where redesign effort would actually matter.

‍

‍

In complex products, especially enterprise software, clarity matters more than completeness. Showing everything at once might feel transparent internally, but for users it often creates noise. Strong products make deliberate choices about hierarchy. Primary actions are easy to spot. Secondary information is available without competing for attention. Advanced controls exist, but they don’t dominate the experience.



This is also where onboarding plays a critical role. Onboarding is not a tour or a checklist. It is part of the product experience itself. When onboarding focuses on real tasks instead of feature explanations, users understand value faster and feel more confident using the product.


We saw this clearly while working on the SaaS design for Cimmra, a supply chain and procurement platform used by operational teams. The challenge wasn’t complexity. It was how that complexity was presented. By restructuring information hierarchy and interaction patterns, the product began to feel calmer and more intuitive without reducing functionality.

‍

[When UX Audits Matter Most]When a UX Audit Makes the Biggest Difference

UX audits are especially effective when:

• A product has grown quickly
• Multiple user roles exist
• New features have been layered over time
• Adoption or retention has plateaued


In these situations, the problem is rarely that the product lacks capability. It’s that the experience hasn’t evolved with the product.

‍

[Key Questions Before Redesign]Questions Product and SaaS Leaders Should Ask Before Redesigning

Before committing to a redesign, a few questions can bring clarity:

• Do users know what to do next when they land on a key screen?
• Are core workflows obvious without explanation?
• Where do users pause, backtrack, or abandon tasks?
• Are similar actions handled consistently across the product?
• Is onboarding guiding users toward outcomes or just features?


If these questions are hard to answer confidently, a UX audit is usually the right starting point.

‍

[Why UX Audits Work]Why Audits Lead to Better Design Decisions

The biggest advantage of a UX design audit is focus. Instead of redesigning everything, teams can prioritise what actually matters.
Audits help:

• Reduce unnecessary redesign work
• Align design decisions with business goals
• Improve clarity without adding complexity
• Build a shared understanding across teams


Design changes made with this clarity tend to last longer and deliver more meaningful results.

‍

‍

Final Thoughts

Redesigning a SaaS product is easy to justify. Redesigning it well requires understanding.A UX design audit creates that understanding. It replaces assumptions with insight and helps teams move forward with confidence rather than guesswork.



If you’re a SaaS founder or product manager and some of this feels familiar, a UI/UX design audit can be a low-risk way to gain clarity.


At Tangle, we often start by offering a free initial UX audit to help teams understand where friction exists and what’s worth improving. It’s not about selling a redesign. It’s about giving you a clearer view of your product before making bigger decisions.